Pune crime court.
A court here has rejected the bail plea of a man accused of cheating a businessman of Rs 2 crore and Rs 40 lakh. Additional Sessions Judge P.S. R. Chaudhry made the decision.(Pune Crime Court News)
Majid Usman Attar (Ra. The accused has been identified as Bopodi. The financial loss of any person is greater than the physical injury. The financial loss hurts the whole family not only mentally, but also socially. In such a situation, I do not think the applicant should be released on bail at this stage, "Additional Sessions Judge P.S. R. Chaudhary's bail plea was rejected.
Samarth police have arrested Nadir Abdul Hussain Hasan Ali Naima Abadi in connection with the fraud case. Synagogue East, Camp) Roya alias Seema Nadir Naima Abadi (35, Ra. Camp) Maulana Shoaib Mainuddin Attar (Ra. Majid Usman Attar (Ra. Khalid Mainuddin Attar (Ra. Iram Shoaib Attar (Ra. He has been booked under the Maharashtra Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and Other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Sorcery Act. The offence is covered under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Institutions) Act, 1999. The incident took place between August 2020 and August 2022. Sheikh Abdul Basit Abdul Latif (45) A complaint has been lodged at the Samarth Nagar police station.
The accused Maulana Shoaib and Nadir are builders. The accused, in connivance, lured Fiardi with a promise of good returns if he invested money in this business when he did not have any import-export business. Believing that, Sheikh invested Rs 2 crore 40 lakh in them from time to time. The accused then cheated them without giving them any money. Similarly, three more cases of cheating were registered by these accused in three different police stations in the last four months. A total of Rs 6 crore 23 lakh 5 thousand have been defrauded in these four crimes.
Additional Sessions Judge P P Chaudhary reserved the order after hearing the bail plea of Usman Attar. Adv. Amey Sirsikar, Adv. Mahesh Jhanwar opposed the bail plea. The court rejected the anticipatory bail plea of the accused. The accused had cheated many people. The construction business of all the accused is a joint venture. Many investors are opposed to the proposal. Additional Public Prosecutor Gahlot said the MPID Act was applicable in the case. "We are investigating the case and more arrests are likely to take place in the coming days," said Assistant Police Inspector Dadasaheb Patil.
All the accused were co-accused in the case. There is evidence against all the accused. Therefore, Section 3 of the MPID Act applies in this case. There is sufficient evidence against the accused. An investigation is underway and more arrests are expected. This crime has been committed. In these circumstances, granting bail to the accused may affect the investigation, "Additional Sessions Judge P.S. R. Chaudhary denied the charge.
